A tale of two invaders: Chemistry, ecology and genetics of invasive Echium spp. in southern Australia
Xiaocheng Zhu  1@  , Dominik Skoneczny  1  , Paul Weston  1  , David Gopurenko  1, 2  , Lucie Meyer  1  , Brendan Lepschi  3  , Ragan Callaway  4  , Geoff Gurr  1, 5  , Leslie Weston  1, *  
1 : Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries)
Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2678 -  Australia
2 : NSW Department of Primary Industries
Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, 2650 -  Australia
3 : Australian National Herbarium
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, Canberra, 2601 -  Australia
4 : Division of Biological Sciences
University of Montana, Missoula, 59812 -  United States
5 : Institute of Applied Ecology
Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002 -  China
* : Corresponding author

Echium plantagineum and E. vulgare are congeneric exotics that possess similar morphological and biological features and were introduced to Australia in a similar time frame. However, E. plantagineum is highly invasive in Australia, whereas E. vulgare is found only sporadically across southeastern Australia. Studies were conducted to evaluate the secondary chemistry, ecology and genetics of each species in an effort to understand their respective invasive success, or lack thereof. In a common garden experiment, E. plantagineum produced qualitatively and quantitatively higher levels of bioactive pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) in its shoots when compared to E. vulgare. PAs have been well documented to be associated with reduced herbivory of insects and are highly hepatotoxic to grazing livestock. In contrast, the perennial E. vulgare produced somewhat higher levels of antimicrobial and potentially allelopathic naphthoquinones in its roots than did E. plantagineum, in a series of glass-house experiments. Similar trends were observed in field-collected plants. Potential ecological roles of these defensive metabolites in Echium spp. invasion will be discussed. The presence of E. plantagineum significantly reduced (P < 0.01) the number and density of other plant species co-habiting the same area in various field locations, while no significant impact of infestation was associated with E. vulgare co-habitation. E. plantagineum also exhibited a much smaller monoploid genome (1C = 0.37pg) when compared to E. vulgare (1C = 0.43pg), and these findings supported the large genome constraint hypothesis associated with reduced invasion success of plants exhibiting a larger genome size. In addition, intensively sampled Australian E. plantagineum populations suggested a much higher level of chloroplastidic genetic diversity (h=0.7661 compared to h=0.3800 in E. vulgare). We conclude that the upregulated production of defence compounds, significant impacts on endemic plant communities and elevated genetic diversity have all logically contributed to the successful invasion of E. plantagineum in Australia.


Online user: 1